Vitruvius — the Roman architect and engineer of the 1st century BCE — outlined Six Principles of Architecture (architecturae principia sex) in De Architectura (Book I, Chapter 2). These six ideas became the foundation of Western architectural theory.
Here’s a structured overview:
—
Vitruvius’ Six Principles of Architecture
Latin Term English Translation Core Meaning Example / Application
1. Ordinatio Order The measured arrangement of parts; establishing a system of proportion (module) that governs the entire design. Setting a column diameter as the module from which all other dimensions derive.
2. Dispositio Arrangement / Design The appropriate placement and composition of spaces; the layout plan or design scheme. The plan, elevation, and section working together coherently.
3. Eurythmia Harmony / Graceful Proportion The pleasing appearance that arises when proportions of parts relate harmoniously to each other and to the whole. A façade whose column spacing, height, and entablature are visually balanced.
4. Symmetria Proportion / Commensurability Mathematical correspondence between elements; the proportional relationship of parts to each other and to the overall figure. The human body analogy: the same ratio governs face, hand, and full height.
5. Decor Appropriateness / Decorum Suitability of design to purpose, place, and cultural context. A temple to Mars should be severe and masculine, not ornate or playful.
6. Distributio Economy / Allocation / Planning Proper management of materials, cost, and site; also rational distribution of functions. Using resources wisely and ensuring circulation and structure are practical.
—
Conceptual Summary
Ordinatio and Symmetria deal with mathematical proportion.
Dispositio and Eurythmia deal with visual harmony and spatial design.
Decor and Distributio deal with appropriateness and function.
Together, they form a complete system:
> From order and plan, through proportion and beauty, to purpose and economy.
—
Would you like me to show how these six principles evolve into Alberti’s triad (firmitas, utilitas, venustas) and later influence Renaissance and Baroque theory (e.g., in Palladio and Borromini)?
Excellent — let’s trace how Vitruvius’ Six Principles evolved into Alberti’s triad and later shaped Renaissance and Baroque architectural theory.
We’ll go chronologically and conceptually, showing how ideas condensed, deepened, and shifted in emphasis.
—
1. Vitruvius (1st century BCE): Six Principles
Goal: Define the total art of building — balancing geometry, proportion, and cultural propriety.
Category Principle Essence
Mathematical Order Ordinatio (Order), Symmetria (Proportion) Architecture arises from number and measure; every part corresponds to a modular system.
Spatial & Visual Harmony Dispositio (Design), Eurythmia (Graceful Appearance) The plan and elevation must achieve compositional balance and visual delight.
Cultural & Practical Fitness Decor (Appropriateness), Distributio (Economy) Buildings must suit their purpose, context, and resources.
Vitruvius defines the architect as both mathematician and humanist, merging science with aesthetics.
—
2. Alberti (15th century): The Humanist Synthesis
Leon Battista Alberti’s De re aedificatoria (c.1452) revives and transforms Vitruvius for the Renaissance.
He condenses the six Vitruvian principles into three universal aims:
Firmitas, Utilitas, Venustas
Term Translation Derived from Vitruvius Meaning in Alberti
Firmitas Strength Ordinatio, Distributio Structural stability and sound construction.
Utilitas Usefulness Dispositio, Decor Functional design — suitability to purpose and human activity.
Venustas Beauty Eurythmia, Symmetria Harmony of parts producing aesthetic delight and intellectual pleasure.
Alberti reinterprets beauty as a mathematical and moral harmony — concinnitas — the perfect adjustment of all parts to form a unified, intelligible whole.
He sees proportion as not just visual but ethical, reflecting divine order in human design.
—
3. Palladio (16th century): Rational Harmony
Andrea Palladio (in I Quattro Libri dell’Architettura, 1570) extends Alberti’s rationalism:
Treats symmetry and proportion as rational laws grounded in humanist geometry.
His villas and churches embody eurhythmia: balance, rhythm, and repose.
Architecture becomes a measured music — geometry turned to space.
In Palladio, Vitruvian science meets Alberti’s humanist beauty.
—
4. Baroque (17th century): Dynamic Transformation
By the Baroque era (Borromini, Guarini, Bernini):
Eurhythmia becomes dynamic: rhythm and movement replace static symmetry.
The humanist ideal of concinnitas gives way to tension, curvature, and illusion.
Geometry is no longer calm but expressive — spirals, ovals, and light orchestrate emotion.
Yet the Vitruvian structure remains:
Firmitas: engineering innovation (domes, vaults)
Utilitas: theatrical space for Counter-Reformation spectacle
Venustas: sensory and spiritual ecstasy
Borromini’s San Carlo alle Quattro Fontane (Rome, 1638–67) is a perfect case:
Mathematical precision + rhythmic distortion = Baroque eurhythmia.
—
5. Conceptual Genealogy (Summary Table)
Epoch Key Thinker Central Concept From Vitruvius’ Principle Evolutionary Shift
Roman Vitruvius Six Principles Full system Harmony = moral, visual, and practical order
Renaissance Alberti Concinnitas (harmonious composition) Eurythmia, Symmetria, Decor Unity of measure and beauty
High Renaissance Palladio Geometric Rationalism Symmetria, Ordinatio Ideal proportion for civic and domestic architecture
Baroque Borromini / Bernini Expressive Rhythm Eurythmia reinterpreted dynamically Spatial movement and emotional resonance
—
In short
> Vitruvius gave architecture its grammar.
Alberti gave it humanist philosophy.
Palladio gave it rational clarity.
Borromini and Bernini gave it emotional music.
—
Would you like me to follow this with a visual typology chart — showing how eurhythmia visually evolves from Vitruvian façade balance to Baroque curvature (column spacing → rhythm → movement)?